Every task can say what is proven, what is merely witnessed, what is inferred, what is unavailable, and what we are explicitly not claiming yet. This keeps product, audit, and sales aligned around the same evidence packet.
Work may be done, but the row still needs final evidence or status cleanup.
The immediate host pressure source was mitigated, but the task still reads as broad in-progress incident work.
The row carries external-facing financing/documentation scope and should not remain ambiguous before outward reuse.
Pause implementation until the human decision is explicit and signed.
Brand architecture and candidate/GA language should not drift into implementation without an explicit human decision.
The rebrand path changes product narrative and external claims, so it needs a signed decision boundary.
Keep visible as blocked until the missing dependency exists.
This broader 100% lane should remain blocked until the smaller proof/read-contract slices land and define the next dependency.
Freshness/latency claims need real live delivery and measurement surfaces, not fixture-only inference.
Cold visitor copy should wait until product claims, not-claimed boundaries, and launch package are stable.
A later artifact likely replaced this row; close or link the replacement.
Evidence exists and should be reviewed or referenced, not treated as live build work.
The read-only observatory task is done and remains useful as baseline UI proof.
The business plan and market evidence exist, but customer/design-partner proof is still explicitly not claimed.
The refusal sample is done and useful as audit evidence for side-effect-free rejection behavior.
Current work has a clear next action and recent evidence.
The refusal/correction proof is visible, but the public alias still needs to remain mapped cleanly to canonical rows.
The UI/read-side proof work has fresh commits, generated artifacts, and passing verification.
Explicitly outside the current claim boundary.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The business plan contains market evidence and positioning, not proof of signed design partners, revenue, or live third-party connectors.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
The current UI demonstrates the receipt shape with fixtures; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion backend.
Evidence is missing or not attached to the packet.
No human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof yet.
No evidence witnesses are referenced yet.
No human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof yet.
No evidence witnesses are referenced yet.
No human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof yet.
No evidence witnesses are referenced yet.
Reasonable from nearby evidence, but should not be marketed as proof.
Only signed rows and task fixtures are available for this proof packet.
Only signed rows and task fixtures are available for this proof packet.
Only signed rows and task fixtures are available for this proof packet.
A corroborating witness exists, but the claim depends on external review.
External or native evidence witnesses are referenced by the receipt.
External or native evidence witnesses are referenced by the receipt.
External or native evidence witnesses are referenced by the receipt.
A redacted human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof.
External or native evidence witnesses are referenced by the receipt.
Evidence is present and directly supports the claim.
A redacted human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
Demo proves refusal/correction visibility for this task fixture; it does not claim full multi-tenant writer coverage.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
A redacted human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
This receipt covers the UI evidence spine and read-only proof surfaces; it does not claim a production receipt ingestion service is deployed.
A redacted human instruction receipt is attached to this task proof.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
This receipt supports business-plan and market-evidence claims; it does not claim design partners, revenue, or live third-party connectors exist yet.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
This receipt proves the operator instruction and observed remediation path; it does not claim Redis was optimized or swap was fully cleared.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.
Signed ledger rows exist for this task scope.